Instagramâs CEO, Adam Mosseri keeps saying the platform is about two things:
âCreativity and connecting with the people you care about.â
That sounds lovely. But the reality? It’s something else entirely. Letâs unpack both of these claimsâand hold them up to the light.
"Creativity" â But Only If the Algorithm Approves
Weâre told Instagram supports creativity. That itâs a place for artists, influencers, photographers, and dreamers. But hereâs the truth:
Instagram doesn’t support creativity. It curates it.
Just like the record executives of the mid-20th century decided which artists got a shot at fame, Instagram’s algorithm now decides which creators get seen. You donât get discovered for being originalâyou get discovered for being algorithmically optimized.
Thatâs not creative freedom. Thatâs creativity with strings attached.
If your art, your style, or your voice doesnât fit the moldâif it’s too sexy, too raw, too real, too nicheâit gets quietly suppressed. Shadowbanned. Buried.
Instagram promotes content that aligns with ad-friendly, brand-safe normsânot necessarily whatâs bold, innovative, or artistically meaningful.
And letâs not forget: AI now governs what is “allowed” on the platform, enforcing vague “community guidelines” through machine learning filters that canât understand context or intention.
Creativity? Instagram has turned it into a numbers game. A branding exercise. A filtered illusion.
Further, the platform encourages homogenization. It says “be yourself,” but the content that wins is often formulaic and trend-driven. The more unique you are, the more invisible you become.
True creativity challenges the status quoâInstagramâs algorithm buries that under whatâs already familiar.
"Connecting with the People You Care About" â Really?
This oneâs almost laughableâbecause Instagramâs design actively prevents you from connecting deeply.
Letâs look at the science.
Dunbarâs Number, a well-studied concept in anthropology, shows that humans can realistically maintain about 150â250 meaningful social relationships. Thatâs our cognitive limit. Beyond that, the quality of connection breaks down.
So if Instagram truly cared about helping us stay close to the people we love, theyâd cap follower and following counts to reflect this reality. Maybe 250, max.
But they donât.
Instead, they encourage infinite scaling. Tens of thousands. Hundreds of thousands. Millions of followers. Why? Because your ârelationshipsâ arenât the product. Your attention is.
Instagram isnât a digital dinner partyâitâs a broadcast network.
It functions more like TV or radio than a tight-knit community. You post, and if the algorithm likes it, your content gets pushed out to the masses. You perform. They watch.
Thatâs not connection. Thatâs performance culture.
Youâre not connecting. Youâre performingâfor hearts, not hugs.
Let's Go Even Deeper: Other Incongruities
Instagram Says: “Be Real”
But Rewards Facades. Filters are everywhere. Facetune culture is thriving. The pressure to post polished, curated content hasnât disappearedâitâs just gone underground.
Instagram rewards performative authenticity, not actual vulnerability.
Instagram Says It's: "Empowering Creators"
But Fuels Comparison and Addiction. The platform is engineered for dopamine hits. Scroll traps. Vanity metrics. Creator burnout is commonâand sometimes celebrated.
If Instagram cared about mental health, it would be less addictiveânot more
Instagram Says: "You Control Your Experience"
But The Algorithm Is the Gatekeeper. You donât choose what you seeâthe machine does. Even your own followers donât always see your content.
Every interaction is mediated by machine logic.
Instagram Says: "Everyone Has a Voice"
But It’s Increasingly Pay-to-Play. Reach is throttled. Boosting is essential. Visibility is now often tied to ad spend or monetization deals.
The feed doesnât reflect whatâs best. It reflects whatâs bankrolled.
Instagram Says: "We Support Community"
But Suppresses Controversial or Marginalized Voices. Content moderation is opaque, inconsistent, and frequently unfair. Thereâs no real appeals process. No transparency. No recourse.
True communities donât exist where one side has all the power and no accountability.
So What Can We Do?
This isnât a call to abandon Instagram. Itâs a call to see it clearly.
Understand what the platform isâand what it isnât. Know that itâs a stage, not a salon. A billboard, not a journal. Use it with intent, not illusion.
If youâre a creator: Make art that matters to you first. Use Instagram as a toolânot a validation machine. Build outside the platform. Own your content. Grow your audience in places where creativity isnât controlled by a feed.
If you’re a follower: Be mindful of your attention. Donât confuse likes for love or visibility for worth. Seek out creators who offer depth, not just dopamine.
If youâre a thinker, a rebel, a builderâletâs imagine and create better spaces. Platforms where creativity is unfiltered, connection is real, and authenticity isnât gamified.
Instagram isnât going to change. But we can change how we use it.
And that might just change everything.
If you enjoyed this post you might want to check out Why Organic Reach Has Declined and Standing in Defiance
Thereâs more waiting for you.
 Explore more of my world here â About Lairissa Lee & RockyMtnBabe




















