Every time we scroll, apply, search, or buy, there’s something quietly watching us in the background: an algorithm. It’s not inherently evil. In fact, in many ways, algorithms help us find what we love, stay connected, and streamline our lives. But when they’re allowed to operate in secrecy—especially when they have the power to deny opportunity, set prices, or restrict access—we have a problem.
A big, invisible problem.
💻 Algorithms Are Quiet Gatekeepers
We already know that social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok use algorithms to determine what gets visibility. Creators are rewarded or suppressed based on unclear and often shifting rules. But it’s not just about who gets likes anymore.
These same types of systems are used by:
- Insurance companies to set your premiums
- Banks to approve or deny loans
- Employers to screen resumes
- Retailers to adjust pricing dynamically
- Law enforcement to predict crime “hot zones”
The real-world implications are staggering. You might be denied coverage, charged more, or excluded from a job interview—and never know that an invisible line of code made the decision for you or towards you. Take Robert Williams, wrongfully arrested by facial recognition. Or the thousands in Michigan whose tax refunds were held because of false fraud flags. Or the other algorithmic mistakes shown in this table that are just the tip of the iceberg.
🔎 Real-Life Examples of Algorithmic Harm
| Scenario | What Happened | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Wrongful Arrests from Facial Recognition | Robert Julian‑Borchak Williams was wrongfully arrested when a facial recognition algorithm mistakenly matched him to a shoplifter. (The University of Iowa – College of Law) | People can literally lose their freedom or suffer serious stigma because algorithms mess up. |
| Health Care Discrimination | A widely used algorithm in U.S. hospitals (for allocating health care) was found to systematically discriminate against Black people, allocating fewer resources or delaying care. (Nature) | When your race or background influences treatment outcomes—not intentionally, but through biased data—your life can be at risk. |
| Algorithmic Bias in Criminal Justice (COMPAS) | COMPAS is used to predict recidivism risk. It was shown that Black defendants were more likely than white to be labeled “high risk” without actually re‑offending, while whites were more often assigned “low risk” incorrectly. (Wikipedia) | When algorithms influence jail time, bail, or parole, mistakes can perpetuate injustice and racial inequality. |
| Automated Systems & Unemployment / Benefits Errors | In Michigan, the MiDAS system falsely flagged around 40,000 people for unemployment fraud. Their tax refunds were withheld; many suffered financially. (TIME) | Algorithms used by government systems or for welfare can cause huge real-life hardship if errors aren’t corrected. |
| False Facial Recognition → Fear & Arrest | Porcha Woodruff — pregnant, arrested because a facial recognition algorithm “matched” her to a suspect when she had nothing to do with the crime. Eventually dismissed. (Innocence Project) | Even after it’s clear someone was innocent, the damage (time, trauma, reputation) is real. |
And yet, when these harms are uncovered, there’s rarely public outcry, rarely accountability. If a medication causes harm, there are lawsuits. If a car part fails, there’s a recall. But when an algorithm quietly ruins someone’s life—denies them housing, mislabels them a criminal, or delays life-saving care—the companies behind it often shrug and say, “It’s proprietary.” We’ve created a system where code can discriminate, fail, or traumatize… and no one is responsible. That has to change.
The danger isn’t abstract. In the world of social media, platforms like Meta have wielded algorithmic decisions like a guillotine — swift, silent, and unaccountable. A growing wave of creators and small business owners have reported waking up to find their accounts suspended or deleted with no warning, no context, and no recourse. In many cases, their only “violation” was being caught in the dragnet of an automated content moderation system that misread a post, flagged a caption, or reacted to a sudden spike in engagement.
One egregious case made headlines when a small business owner who ran a handmade jewelry shop lost her entire Facebook and Instagram presence overnight — thousands of followers gone, ad accounts shut down, and revenue instantly halted. Her appeals were met with silence. Meta’s help channels offered nothing. She was left to start over from scratch with no explanation. Her story is not unique — and that’s the problem.
For those of us who rely on social media not just for expression, but for income, visibility, and connection, the threat of algorithmic error is a daily fear. We don’t just worry about engagement — we worry about disappearance. With no human in the loop, no transparency, and no accountability, these systems decide who stays and who vanishes. And they do so with the cold indifference of a machine.
These aren’t just bugs or quirks — they’re existential threats to real people’s livelihoods.
🤐 The Black Box Problem
Companies often claim their algorithms are proprietary — protected intellectual property. That means the rules that directly impact your life can be hidden from you, with zero obligation to explain, justify, or correct mistakes.
These aren’t just abstract formulas. These are digital levers that influence access to credit, job opportunities, health coverage, and — in the case of creators and small businesses — your entire livelihood.
Imagine if food producers could say, “We can’t tell you what’s in our food — it’s a trade secret.”
Imagine if power companies could say, “We don’t have to meet safety standards — our grid design is confidential.”
Unthinkable, right?
So why do we accept it from algorithms that can deny mortgages, block visibility, or reinforce discrimination?
This isn’t just theoretical. For creators, it’s an everyday risk — a form of algorithmic fragility.
💔Algorithmic Fragility in the Creator Economy
Feeling constantly fearful, knowing you are powerless.
In the creator economy, your reach, your revenue, your entire platform depends on algorithms. But unlike other industries where regulation, inspection, or accountability exist, creators operate in silence — constantly guessing what invisible rules they might be breaking.
One false flag, a mistaken report, or a misunderstood post can bury your content… or delete your account. You’re left to appeal to a black box with no face, no phone number, no recourse.
When it happens, there’s no public hearing, no customer support line, no apology. Just vanishing access — and the terrifying silence that follows.
For those of us who build something real on social platforms, that’s the scariest part:
Not the algorithm itself — but the fact that we have no rights against it.
⚖️ It’s Time for Oversight
We already regulate so much that affects the public:
- Food is inspected by the FDA
- Utilities are overseen by state commissions
- Medications are subject to rigorous trials and public disclosure
So why not algorithms? If a bank uses an AI model to approve loans, it should be tested for bias, audited for fairness, and required to publish impact reports. If Instagram limits your reach based on content it deems “risky,” you deserve to know how that decision was made.
And that’s the core of the issue:
If a drug causes harm, there are investigations, recalls, class actions.
If an algorithm causes harm, there’s silence.
No warning labels. No disclosures. No accountability.
Just quiet damage — to someone’s business, someone’s job application, someone’s dream.
In almost every other industry, we demand oversight. We require transparency.
But in the world of algorithms? The harm often goes unnoticed. And when it is noticed… responsibility is rarely assigned.
It’s time we stop pretending these systems are neutral.
They are powerful, fallible, and deeply impactful — and that means they must be subject to scrutiny, just like anything else that affects human lives.
This isn’t about punishing innovation. It’s about protecting people.
📢 Transparency Isn’t Optional Anymore
As long as algorithms stay in the shadows, companies can deny responsibility for what those systems do. “It’s the algorithm,” they shrug—an answer that means nothing and helps no one.
We need a new standard:
- Transparent auditing of high-impact algorithms
- Public accountability for discriminatory or harmful outcomes
- Government oversight, just like any other product that affects people’s well-being
Because when systems make decisions about people, those people deserve to know the why behind the what.
🧠 Final Thoughts
I live in a world shaped by algorithms. As a creator, as a consumer, and as a human being—I see how often digital systems are making judgments about me without any transparency.
That’s not just frustrating. It’s dangerous.
The technology we build should serve us—not the other way around. And it starts by pulling back the curtain.
Let’s demand better.
Add a Comment